Author Topic: Interesting article  (Read 1259 times)

Offline ginger aka Gellchom

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 132
  • My real name is Biff Picklesby
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2018, 03:35:11 pm »
Heirloom pieces open up a whole 'nother can of worms, though.  And I really think the recipient needs to be in on it, if there is anything unusual about it.  I mean, if I was Kate and William surprised me with Diana's ring, I'd be like, 'Hell, no.  I'm not wearing your dead mother's ring.'  I'm thinking they must have discussed it ahead of time and Kate was OK with it.  If he surprised her?  She's an incredibly tolerant woman!

I always wondered what Kate thought about the ring too. The style is very 80's.

Personally, I still think of it as Princess Diana's ring and I'm sure many people do too. I wonder how Kate feels about a ring that's "not her own."

Even for myself, a person as common as you can get, I don't want my husband's great-grandma's ring. Too much responsibility and baggage involving his entire family.

Once you're talking about royalty and royal jewels, I think you're in a whole different zone.

For myself, I love passing on family jewelry.  The diamond in my engagement ring had been in my grandmother's (right, mine, not my husband's!) engagement ring.  My mother gave my daughter a diamond she owned for her engagement ring. 

But you are right that it can be a responsibility.  My mother also gave her own original engagement ring diamond to my son to give to his bride, which he did.  Now she is his ex-wife; we are hoping she will return the stone to my mother after a little more time has passed.  It's not her legal obligation, of course, but that's what I think most people would do.  She isn't impoverished and there wasn't any abuse or cheating or anything, they just weren't happy together.

This reminds me of how funny my daughter and son-in-law were when they got engaged.  They live overseas and were visiting here.  They were engaged as far as I was concerned -- they knew they were going to get married and even when; they were doing vendor research on that visit.  And I believe they had even ordered a setting for the ring.  But of course there had to be an Official Proposal!  And the ring wouldn't be ready before they left.  So they made a reservation at a fancy restaurant, and I took my son-in-law to Target to buy the least expensive "diamond" ring we could find -- I think it cost $8 -- and he "proposed" with that.  It was all kind of silly, but it didn't hurt anyone and they had fun.

Offline Kiwi Cupcake

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #31 on: June 14, 2018, 09:14:57 am »
But you are right that it can be a responsibility.  My mother also gave her own original engagement ring diamond to my son to give to his bride, which he did.  Now she is his ex-wife; we are hoping she will return the stone to my mother after a little more time has passed.  It's not her legal obligation, of course, but that's what I think most people would do.  She isn't impoverished and there wasn't any abuse or cheating or anything, they just weren't happy together.

Yes, this is what I mean. It's still thought of as "mom's diamond" or "the family diamond" not the ex-wife's. If the ring was brand new, nobody would think or hope it gets returned.

This reminds me of how funny my daughter and son-in-law were when they got engaged.  They live overseas and were visiting here.  They were engaged as far as I was concerned -- they knew they were going to get married and even when; they were doing vendor research on that visit.  And I believe they had even ordered a setting for the ring.  But of course there had to be an Official Proposal!  And the ring wouldn't be ready before they left.  So they made a reservation at a fancy restaurant, and I took my son-in-law to Target to buy the least expensive "diamond" ring we could find -- I think it cost $8 -- and he "proposed" with that.  It was all kind of silly, but it didn't hurt anyone and they had fun.

That's really cute. Did she keep the Target ring? I would! :D

Offline gramma dishes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #32 on: June 14, 2018, 09:44:59 am »

That's really cute. Did she keep the Target ring? I would! :D

I would too.  In a different way, it would almost be as or even more special than the "real" one!  What a sweet memory!

Offline Lynn2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #33 on: June 14, 2018, 03:46:21 pm »
If the guy made a good-faith attempt at buying a ring he thought his fiancee would like--I'm not sure if we can really say; spending only $15 and refusing her suggestion that they shop together makes me wonder--then honestly I would probably keep it. But, I'm not a big jewelry-wearing person. If it was too big or awkward to wear on my hand, I could put it on a necklace chain, or only wear it for special occasions when getting "dressed up."

Most of the time I see women wanting to be "surprised with the perfect thing" and mad when the guy can't read their mind.  ::) It's totally normal to go to a jewelry store and pick out several things, then one person leaves while the other makes the final decision--the stores do that all the time. Or, if one person can send the other pictures of what they want, the buyer could show them to a salesperson and get advice (probably better at a dedicated jewelry store). Or even shopping and picking it out together, or both parties being involved in designing something custom. If the style really matters to you, because you often wear jewelry and you have a style, then frickin' give serious input. (Like I would never let someone else choose my wedding dress, because I have a certain style of clothing I'm comfortable with, and odds are they would not pick out something I'd be comfortable wearing even for a few hours.)

Or else, take the gift you are offered with good grace, even if it's not "perfect." Again, assuming a good faith attempt. The entire point of an engagement ring is to be symbolic--your future spouse isn't going to be perfect, either, but you take them anyway.

Offline GloryAndCrumpets

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 296
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #34 on: June 14, 2018, 04:03:45 pm »
I would love to get an update on this! Did she ever figure out how to broach it with her fiance? Was he upset? Did they get a new ring? WHAT HAPPENED NEXT I'M INVESTED, DARNITALL!!!!
Agree Agree x 1 Funny Funny x 2 View List

Offline gramma dishes

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #35 on: June 14, 2018, 05:43:42 pm »
I would love to get an update on this! Did she ever figure out how to broach it with her fiance? Was he upset? Did they get a new ring? WHAT HAPPENED NEXT I'M INVESTED, DARNITALL!!!!


Wish we could sometimes click two ratings symbols.  I did think your comment was funny and marked it so, but I also agree, so I'd have also liked to have given it a check mark "I agree" one.  I'd like to know how it turned out too!   ;D
« Last Edit: June 14, 2018, 05:46:16 pm by gramma dishes »
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline Billia

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #36 on: June 15, 2018, 07:01:14 am »
She took the post and her account down once it started going viral so I’m doubtful of an update. I am assuming either he saw it or she was afraid he would see it ...

Offline Morrigan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Location: Canada
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #37 on: June 15, 2018, 07:57:47 pm »
My husband and I picked out an engagement ring together. I just have a simple silver band, but it works well with the ring he made me (we took a silversmith course and made each other's wedding bands - his is hammered silver, and mine has a silver press design). On our first wedding anniversary, he got me a ring to match my engagement band - I currently wear all three rings, and I get a ton of compliments on them.

Offline Lynn2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #38 on: June 15, 2018, 08:28:20 pm »
That's another possibility--she could wear the "ugly" ring until a certain point, like their first anniversary, and maybe in the intervening time have told him that she would prefer a different style (or enough people would have seen it and gone :o to him that he would finally get the idea). It doesn't have to be all or nothing right now, perfect or a total failure. I know showing off the ring has always been a thing, but especially with the rise of social media (I hear about people getting manicures so their hand looks its best in the ring show-off photo). Maybe if there was a little less emphasis on that, though, and more on the long haul, bigger picture of marriage, it wouldn't seem so "devastating" to get a ring that isn't perfect.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Mutter Clucker

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #39 on: June 21, 2018, 01:34:30 am »
I would be close enough to a man I said "yes" to marrying that I could also say "Are you serious with this?" when confronted with that thing. And $15??? I'm not asking for the 3 months salary nonsense but really, come on.
Agree Agree x 2 View List